Table of Contents

Most things come with a manual stating their use, purpose, and limitations. In the same way, every act, statute or legislation, comes with their Preamble.

Preamble refers to an introductory or preliminary statement, especially attached to a statute or constitution highlighting its purpose. It is the reflection of the core values, philosophy and objectives that embody the Constitution.

Preamble of the Constitution of India

“WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:

JUSTICE, social, economic and political;

LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;

EQUALITY of status and opportunity;

and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;

IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.

Preamble is pragmatic interpretation of provisions of the Constitution. It does not grant any substantive rights to the people and neither is enforceable in the courts. It was introduced and based on the Objective Resolution by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru on December 13, 1946, and was unanimously adopted by the Constituent Assembly on January 22, 1947. Preamble is the soul of the Constitution. Through various judgement of the Supreme Court, it has been held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution.

The Indian Constitution was adopted on 26th November, 1949.

Nature of Indian State

The Preamble declares India to be a Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic. It highlights the fundamental principles that shape the nature and functioning of the Indian State.

  1. Sovereign – India is an independent state; free from both internal and external power/influence. There exists no dominion of other nation. UN or Commonwealth membership has no effect on India’s sovereignty.
  • Internal Sovereignty – It means that the Indian Govt. has the ultimate decision-making power within its territorial boundaries.
  • External Sovereignty – It implies that India is not subject to control or interference by any external power.
  1. Socialist -  Inspired by the philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, the term ‘Socialist’ was added through the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976. It simply means to have social and economic equality; eliminating poverty, inequality of opportunities and related matters from the society. Its core objective is to develop a ‘Welfare State’.
  • Excel Wear v. Union of India (1979) – In this case, the Supreme Court found that with the addition of the word socialist, a portal is opened to lean the judgements in favour of nationalisation and state ownership of the industry. But the principle of socialism and social justice cannot ignore the interests and rights of a different section of the society, i.e., the private owners.
  • Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) – In this case, the Constitution bench had considered the meaning of the word ‘Socialism’ to crystallise a socialistic state securing to its people socio-economic justice by interplay of the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
  • D.S. Nakara v. Union of India (1983) – In this case, the Supreme Court remarked that socialism aims at providing the working people a decent standard of living.
  1. Secular – The term ‘Secular’ was also added through the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976. It simply means that the State will have no religion. The State will treat all religions and religious groups equally and with equal respect without in any manner interfering with their individual rights of religion, faith and worship. The makers of the Constitution of India has devised a unique and positive meaning of the term ‘Secular’. In many nations, this term has been referred to as anti-religion. For instance, in France, one cannot publicly practice religion. Whereas in India, every person has the right to preach, practice and propagate any religion they choose. Art. 25 to 28 constitutes the right to freedom of religion.
  • S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) – In this case, the Supreme Court held that secularism is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution.
  • St. Xaviers College v. State of Gujarat & Anr. (1974) – In this case, the court held that secularism is neither anti-God nor pro-God. Secularism means to not involve God in the matters of the State; there is no relation between State and God.
  1. Democratic – Democracy simply means, “Rule of the People.” Democracy is of two types, i.e. direct and indirect. India has indirect democracy, also known as, representative form of democracy. In a democratic state there exist universal adult franchise (only people having age of 18 years or above can vote), periodic elections (free and fair) etc. In India, be it any level (Union, State, or Local), the govt. is formed though free and fair election at periodic intervals; with the system of ‘One Man, One Vote.’ The Indian govt. is based on the principle, “By the People, For the People, and Of the People.”
  2. Republic – There are two categories of democratic polity – monarchy and republic. In a Monarchy, the head of the State is a king/queen (hereditary position). For eg.: Britain. In a Republic, the head of the State is elected, either directly or indirectly. Political Sovereignty lies in the people and not in any individual, such as a king or a queen. There exists no privileged class. The President of India is the nominal head, whereas, the Prime Minister is the real head of the State; both are elected. This form of govt. ensures that the power and authority of the state are derived from people’s mandate.

Objectives of the Constitution of India

The Preamble highlights the fundamental objectives of the Indian Constitution. The objectives are:

  1. Justice – Social, Economic and Political
  • Social – equal treatment of all citizens without social distinction (caste, religion, etc.) [Art. 14].
  • Economic – eliminating inequalities in wealth, income and property.
  • Political – all citizens have equal political rights, equal access to all political offices and equal voice in the government.

Political Justice is achieved through Fundamental Rights, whereas, Directive Principles of State Policy seeks to achieve Socio-Economic Justice.

  1. Liberty – It means absence of restraints on the activities of individuals, and providing opportunities for the development of individual personalities. The Preamble guarantees Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship.
  2. Equality – It refers to absence of special privileges to any particular section of society. The Preamble assures the Equality of Status and Opportunity to all citizens. There exists provision of adequate opportunities for all individual without any discrimination.

Three dimensions of equality:

  1. Civic – Art. 14 to 18 of Fundamental Rights
  2. Political – Art. 325 & 326
  • Art. 325 – no person is to be declared ineligible for inclusion in electoral rolls on grounds of religion, race, caste, or sex.
  • Art. 326 – elections to the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies to be on the basis of adult suffrage.
  1. Economic – Art. 39 of DPSP
  1. Fraternity – It simply means, “a sense of brotherhood.” Fraternity manifests single citizenship, fundamental duty to promote harmony and brotherhood. It aims to promote the dignity of the individual and the integrity of the nation, thereby strengthening the nation’s social fabric. India being a multilingual and multi-religious State, the unity and integrity can be preserved only through a spirit of brotherhood that pervades the entire country, among all its citizens, irrespective of their differences.

Is Preamble a Part of the Constitution?

Whether to consider Constitution as a part of the Constitution or not, has been the subject of extensive debate and judicial interpretation. This question along with the question of amenability of the Constitution is centred around one important provision, i.e., Art. 368; which describes the power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution.

Yes, Preamble is a part of the Constitution; but it is not a source of power or the source of limitations of the Constitution.

Related Case Laws

  1. The Berubari Union Case (1960): A seven-judge bench presided over this case. The court mentioned that the Parliament can, through Art. 368, amend any part of the Constitution. The court initially held that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution and thus, it cannot be amended. The Court relied on the American jurisprudence, which viewed the Preamble as a mere introductory statement and not a source of power.
  2. Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973): This case is famous for the fact that it witnessed the largest constitution bench to preside over (13-judge bench) till date. In this case, the Supreme Court reversed the Berubari Union Case verdict. The court held that the Preamble was adopted and enacted in the same way as other parts of the Constitution; it is an integral part of the Constitution. Thus, as per the provision under Art. 368, Parliament can amend the Preamble, just like any other part of the Constitution.

Note: - The Preamble encompasses various basic and foundational features of the Constitution. Although, Parliament can amend the Preamble; it cannot interfere with or amend the basic features of the Preamble.

  1. LIC of India Case (1995): In this case, the court reiterated that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution. However, the court explicitly mentioned that it cannot be enforced in court as a standalone provision.

42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976

The Preamble was amended once by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976. The recommendations of the Sardar Swaran Singh Committee led to the amendment of the Preamble.

Three crucial terms were added through this amendment – ‘Socialist’, ‘Secular’ and ‘Integrity’. The introduction of these terms didn’t alter or played with the basic features of the Preamble. In fact, they strengthened the overall spirit of the Constitution. Therefore, the amendment was considered valid.

Conclusion

The Preamble serves as the moral, philosophical, and constitutional foundation of the Indian state, encapsulating the core values of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. It acts as a vital interpretive guide for the judiciary, ensuring that policies and laws align with fundamental principles like secular neutrality and national integration. By reflecting both the ideals of the freedom struggle and universal human rights standards, the Preamble establishes the essential identity and sovereign character of the nation on both domestic and global fronts.

The question of the Preamble’s amenability highlights the delicate balance between constitutional permanence and societal progression. In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), the Supreme Court resolved this by ruling that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution and can be amended under Article 368. However, this power is subject to the limitation that any amendment must not alter or destroy its “basic structure”; the core values that define the democratic and secular fabric of India.

Thus, the Preamble remains a living, dynamic instrument rather than a static historical text. While it is amenable to change to accommodate the evolving needs of a modern society, as demonstrated by the 42nd Amendment, its foundational values remain permanent. It successfully preserves the historic aspirations of the nation’s founders while providing subsequent generations with a flexible framework to navigate contemporary challenges.